Mean calculation method in unbalanced cross-over study [Software]
Dear all,
I found the difference of mean calculation method between equivtest 1.0 and 2.0. Equivtest 1.0 calculates (mean_seq1+mean_seq2)/2 instead of {(mean_seq1*n1)+(mean_seq2*n2)}/(n1+n2). The company confirmed Equivtest 2.0 is right. Which is the right one in your opinion? Is the other method absolutely wrong? I would also like to know the theoretical basis.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Yu Chul Kim
Korea, Republic of
I found the difference of mean calculation method between equivtest 1.0 and 2.0. Equivtest 1.0 calculates (mean_seq1+mean_seq2)/2 instead of {(mean_seq1*n1)+(mean_seq2*n2)}/(n1+n2). The company confirmed Equivtest 2.0 is right. Which is the right one in your opinion? Is the other method absolutely wrong? I would also like to know the theoretical basis.
I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Yu Chul Kim
Korea, Republic of
Complete thread:
- Mean calculation method in unbalanced cross-over studyyckim 2008-05-27 15:04
- EquivTest v1 / v2 / PK Helmut 2008-05-27 15:41
- EquivTest v1 / v2 / PK yckim 2008-05-28 01:39
- Weighted mean Helmut 2008-05-28 11:55
- Least square mean d_labes 2008-05-28 16:35
- Least square mean yckim 2008-06-03 07:46
- Least square mean JPL 2008-06-03 09:10
- Least square mean vish14184 2008-06-04 06:54
- Least square mean JPL 2008-06-04 08:44
- Least square mean vish14184 2008-06-04 06:54
- Least square mean JPL 2008-06-03 09:10
- Least square mean yckim 2008-06-03 07:46
- Least square mean d_labes 2008-05-28 16:35
- Weighted mean Helmut 2008-05-28 11:55
- EquivTest v1 / v2 / PK yckim 2008-05-28 01:39
- EquivTest v1 / v2 / PK Helmut 2008-05-27 15:41