Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • SAS vs. WinNonlin: different sequence effect results

SAS vs. WinNonlin: different sequence effect results [Software]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2008-05-06 17:56 (6613 d 03:21 ago) – Posting: # 1821
Views: 27,296

Dear Eva,

I am not a SAS or WinNonlin specialist, but I would have a basic question. Where do you read the SAS F and p values from? Usually the printouts I see from SAS present the results in two parts. You first have the full ANOVA with sequence, subject(seq), period and treatment (with F and p values), then a specific test for sequence using the MS for subject(seq) as an error term, (again with a F and p value). Only the results of this specific test are supposed to be considered.

Could this be the origin of the difference you found?

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

SAS vs. WinNonlin: different sequence effect results Eva 2008-05-06 14:04
- SAS vs. WinNonlin: different sequence effect resultsOhlbe 2008-05-06 15:56
- imbalanced design? Helmut 2008-05-06 16:13
  - Sample data & results Eva 2008-05-06 17:42
    - Error factor Ohlbe 2008-05-06 19:25
      - Error tests between/within Helmut 2008-05-06 21:33
        
        Error tests between/within Helmut 2008-05-07 18:18
        The power to know d_labes 2008-05-08 11:16
        
        The power to know Helmut 2008-05-08 17:18
        
        The power to know d_labes 2008-05-09 09:35
        
        The power to know Nirali 2008-05-09 11:00
        
        The power to know d_labes 2008-05-16 08:54
        
        The power to know kevan 2009-05-25 15:46
        
        Bogus statement for 2,2,2-BE ElMaestro 2009-05-25 22:25
        
        Bogus? What? d_labes 2009-05-27 08:57
        
        Linear model on steroids ElMaestro 2009-05-28 19:12
        
        Fixed nowadays what? d_labes 2009-05-27 09:03
        
        Kinetica 5.0 bug Helmut 2008-12-31 16:42