LSM differences in SAS vs Phoenix [Software]

posted by Shuanghe  – Spain, 2017-01-20 13:31 (3435 d 06:04 ago) – Posting: # 16990
Views: 8,591

Hi Sundar,

From what you said, I guess you should check your SAS code first. Maybe you coded treatment as A and B for test and reference but you copy/paste the sas code from guideline or somewhere else? If so, change the order of -1 1 to 1 -1 in estimate statement since many of those code assume that the treatment is coded as T and R, so the order is reversed. e.g.ESTIMATE 'Test vs. Reference' treat -1 1 to ESTIMATE 'Test vs. Reference' treat 1 -1.

If your sas code is correct then I couldn't think of any reason how one can screw up Phoenix setting since you would visually assigned which formulation is reference, whether it is coded as A/B, T/R or 1/2. You should know which is which.

All the best,
Shuanghe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
172 visitors (0 registered, 172 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5