Call for duty [Software]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2015-07-21 15:04 (3986 d 13:07 ago) – Posting: # 15119
Views: 24,439

Dear Helmut,

❝ On the other hand agencies published SAS-code for some BE-methods (FDA: RSABE for HVDs and NTIDs; EMA: ABEL). It is certainly easier to copy-paste code compared to setting up / validating it in PHX/WNL (took me some weeks). Up to now nobody succeeded to code this stuff in R. :crying:


If you mean the statistics of such methods: Which one do you like first? I could imagine some ambitious R-coders out there which could be able to do the job.
Except of course implementing the SAS Proc mixed code for replicate designs :PCchaos:.

BTW: The reason for using SAS for the stats is very, very easy: "SAS is validated."

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
189 visitors (0 registered, 189 guests [including 91 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5