Kinetica [Software]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2015-06-03 21:03 (4031 d 23:17 ago) – Posting: # 14906
Views: 10,120

Öberster großer Meister!

We know already the (published) opinion of some well known member of the PKWP. Seems statisticians of the EMA (BSWP) are adepts of his opinion.

I'm curious why. Scientifically!

It's a pitty that we don't know a counter example.
In my gut feeling there must be some! Remenber our discussion that Kinetica is Number three?

Any body out there used Kinetica in unbalanced studies? I promise you full anonymity :yes:.

ElMaestro: Let us be informed if you could identify some "Why's". Scientifically!
Some insight from Helmut's presentation in Prague?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
164 visitors (0 registered, 164 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5