Proc Mixed for >2 treatments [Software]

posted by H_Rotter – Germany, 2008-01-08 14:20 (6747 d 05:13 ago) – Posting: # 1480
Views: 14,853

Hi Matz!

❝ Hai All

  ^^ -- that's German for 'shark' :hungry:

❝ Anybody please tell me what is the advantage of using Proc MIXED insted of Proc GLM in the SAS program, for the analysis of bioequivalence studies with missing values (subjects not completed some periods).


See this post by Jaime and Helmut's as well.
So if you have more than two treatments in your study you may use Proc MIXED.
In a 2×2 study you will get the same results - but Proc MIXED is more time consuming (iterative instead of explicit).

❝ Is it required to specify in the protocol that which procedure (GLM or MIXED) is use for the statistical analysis.


IMHO that's a good idea. Simply specify it as a decision tree:
No drop-outs (complete data from all periods) → Proc GLM
Drop-outs (incomplete data) → Proc MIXED

Regards,
Hermann

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
299 visitors (0 registered, 299 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5