Proc Mixed for >2 treatments [Software]

posted by H_Rotter – Germany, 2008-01-08 14:20 (6330 d 06:42 ago) – Posting: # 1480
Views: 12,696

Hi Matz!

❝ Hai All

  ^^ -- that's German for 'shark' :hungry:

❝ Anybody please tell me what is the advantage of using Proc MIXED insted of Proc GLM in the SAS program, for the analysis of bioequivalence studies with missing values (subjects not completed some periods).


See this post by Jaime and Helmut's as well.
So if you have more than two treatments in your study you may use Proc MIXED.
In a 2×2 study you will get the same results - but Proc MIXED is more time consuming (iterative instead of explicit).

❝ Is it required to specify in the protocol that which procedure (GLM or MIXED) is use for the statistical analysis.


IMHO that's a good idea. Simply specify it as a decision tree:
No drop-outs (complete data from all periods) → Proc GLM
Drop-outs (incomplete data) → Proc MIXED

Regards,
Hermann

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
203 visitors (0 registered, 203 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5