Group effect commonly not relevant [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-07-07 01:57 (3942 d 06:29 ago) – Posting: # 13224
Views: 26,747

Hi Angus,

❝ I did see that Formulation not Treatment later after lunch,


For years I try to convince Pharsight to switch from “Formulation” to the more general “Treatment”.

❝ Then following your direction about Group being a classification variable…


Yep, in the BE-module standard mappings are Subject, Sequence, Period, and Formulation. Any additional Classification variables (aka factors = categorical in­de­pen­dent variables) have to be manually mapped. The same is true for regressors (aka con­ti­nu­ous covariates like body weight).

❝ … (and including subject in model) I did get it to work.


Hhm, I think that Subject should have been mapped automatically. :confused:

❝ Many thanks and also your sample size program in R works well: I have almost zero experience in R, but the reference you provided was easy to follow.


The flowers should go to Detlew. I wrote maybe <1‰ of the code…

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The true Enlightenment thinker, the true rationalist,
never wants to talk anyone into anything.
No, he does not even want to convince;
all the time he is aware that he may be wrong.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5