Group effect commonly not relevant [Software]
Hello Helmut: Yes; I did see that Formulation not Treatment later after lunch, but it still did not work. Then following your direction about Group being a classification variable (and including subject in model) I did get it to work.
The formulation by group interaction p value was 0.95 for this composed data set.
Many thanks and also your sample size program in R works well: I have almost zero experience in R, but the reference you provided was easy to follow.
Here is the setup I used in Phoenix: Subject has to be mapped to get it to work (see link below)
http://screencast.com/t/EpJVIvdBr
Angus
Edit: BBCoded and a later post merged. [Helmut]
Dependent hyothesis NumDF Denomin Fstat p value
Ln(AUC) int 1 64 11226.673 0
Ln(AUC) Group 1 64 0.006028186 0.93835554
Ln(AUC) Sequence 1 64 3.4513852 0.067800018
Ln(AUC) Group*Sequence 1 64 0.000321727 0.9857451
Ln(AUC) Group*Period 2 64 0.064946799 0.937179
Ln(AUC) Formulation 1 64 0.36503556 0.54785867
Ln(AUC) Formulation*Group 1 64 0.002630007 0.95925927
The formulation by group interaction p value was 0.95 for this composed data set.
Many thanks and also your sample size program in R works well: I have almost zero experience in R, but the reference you provided was easy to follow.
Here is the setup I used in Phoenix: Subject has to be mapped to get it to work (see link below)
http://screencast.com/t/EpJVIvdBr
Angus
Edit: BBCoded and a later post merged. [Helmut]
Complete thread:
- Phoenix WNL to handle 2x2 crossover study with multip group zan 2014-06-27 23:29
- Phoenix WNL to handle 2x2 crossover study with multip group ElMaestro 2014-06-28 23:23
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-06-30 16:55
- Group effect in 2x2 BE study zan 2014-06-30 19:18
- Group effect in 2x2 BE study ElMaestro 2014-06-30 20:36
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 20:51
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:02
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 21:38
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:46
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 22:22
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-01 01:15
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL Helmut 2014-07-01 12:26
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL zan 2014-07-01 18:03
- Loosing patience Helmut 2014-07-01 18:23
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL zan 2014-07-01 18:03
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL Helmut 2014-07-01 12:26
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-01 01:15
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 22:22
- To pool or not to pool ElMaestro 2014-06-30 22:11
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-01 01:18
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-02 19:56
- To pool or not to pool ElMaestro 2014-07-03 00:17
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-03 00:36
- sequence- / period effect #666 Helmut 2014-07-03 10:05
- To pool or not to pool ElMaestro 2014-07-03 00:17
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:46
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 21:38
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:02
- Group effect commonly not relevant AngusMcLean 2014-07-06 16:19
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 20:32
- Group effect commonly not relevantAngusMcLean 2014-07-06 22:52
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 23:57
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 15:04
- PHX: Parameter mapping Helmut 2014-07-07 15:45
- PHX: Parameter mapping Shuanghe 2014-07-07 17:35
- Great hint! Helmut 2014-07-07 17:54
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 20:49
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 18:46
- PHX: Parameter mapping Shuanghe 2014-07-07 17:35
- PHX: Parameter mapping Helmut 2014-07-07 15:45
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 15:04
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 23:57
- Group effect commonly not relevantAngusMcLean 2014-07-06 22:52
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 20:32
- Group effect in 2x2 BE study zan 2014-06-30 19:18