Group effect commonly not relevant [Software]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2014-07-07 00:52 (3942 d 08:03 ago) – Posting: # 13222
Views: 26,819

Hello Helmut: Yes; I did see that Formulation not Treatment later after lunch, but it still did not work. Then following your direction about Group being a classification variable (and including subject in model) I did get it to work.

Dependent hyothesis     NumDF Denomin     Fstat       p value
Ln(AUC)   int               1   64    11226.673       0
Ln(AUC)   Group             1   64        0.006028186 0.93835554
Ln(AUC)   Sequence          1   64        3.4513852   0.067800018
Ln(AUC)   Group*Sequence    1   64        0.000321727 0.9857451
Ln(AUC)   Group*Period      2   64        0.064946799 0.937179
Ln(AUC)   Formulation       1   64        0.36503556  0.54785867
Ln(AUC)   Formulation*Group 1   64        0.002630007 0.95925927

The formulation by group interaction p value was 0.95 for this composed data set.

Many thanks and also your sample size program in R works well: I have almost zero experience in R, but the reference you provided was easy to follow.


Here is the setup I used in Phoenix: Subject has to be mapped to get it to work (see link below)
http://screencast.com/t/EpJVIvdBr

Angus


Edit: BBCoded and a later post merged. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
27 visitors (0 registered, 27 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The true Enlightenment thinker, the true rationalist,
never wants to talk anyone into anything.
No, he does not even want to convince;
all the time he is aware that he may be wrong.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5