Group effect commonly not relevant [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-07-06 22:32 (4350 d 23:40 ago) – Posting: # 13221
Views: 30,552

Hi Angus,

❝ I tried to set up the model from above, but I found the program rejected the code I put it in (text turns red). I do not know what boxes to check to get the program to accept the code, which includes "Group".


Sorry; Phoenix insists in Formulation, not Treatment. In the setup you have to map Group to Classification. Try:
fixed:  Group+Sequence+Sequence(Group)+Period(Group)+Formulation+Formulation*Group
random: Subject(Sequence*Group)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
155 visitors (0 registered, 155 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5