To pool or not to pool [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-07-01 00:11 (3948 d 08:10 ago) – Posting: # 13181
Views: 26,994

Hi Helmut and Zan,

❝ Without knowing the original data I will not comment on the reviewers comments. Do you think that she is aware of “false positives”?


Considering that the reviewer is Bing Li, I'd say the dossier had a very competent review.
However, the review is from 2005. That was around the time when ordinary sequence effects were proposed to be tested with 10% alpha and not considered nuisance. It might be the same phenomenon applied here to group which is also a between-subject term.
Today I think the policy has informally changed. As usual I could be wrong; at least I am not aware of any formalised guidance.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The true Enlightenment thinker, the true rationalist,
never wants to talk anyone into anything.
No, he does not even want to convince;
all the time he is aware that he may be wrong.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5