To pool or not to pool [Software]
Hi Helmut and Zan,
Considering that the reviewer is Bing Li, I'd say the dossier had a very competent review.
However, the review is from 2005. That was around the time when ordinary sequence effects were proposed to be tested with 10% alpha and not considered nuisance. It might be the same phenomenon applied here to group which is also a between-subject term.
Today I think the policy has informally changed. As usual I could be wrong; at least I am not aware of any formalised guidance.
❝ Without knowing the original data I will not comment on the reviewers comments. Do you think that she is aware of “false positives”?
Considering that the reviewer is Bing Li, I'd say the dossier had a very competent review.
However, the review is from 2005. That was around the time when ordinary sequence effects were proposed to be tested with 10% alpha and not considered nuisance. It might be the same phenomenon applied here to group which is also a between-subject term.
Today I think the policy has informally changed. As usual I could be wrong; at least I am not aware of any formalised guidance.
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- Phoenix WNL to handle 2x2 crossover study with multip group zan 2014-06-27 23:29
- Phoenix WNL to handle 2x2 crossover study with multip group ElMaestro 2014-06-28 23:23
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-06-30 16:55
- Group effect in 2x2 BE study zan 2014-06-30 19:18
- Group effect in 2x2 BE study ElMaestro 2014-06-30 20:36
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 20:51
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:02
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 21:38
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:46
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 22:22
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-01 01:15
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL Helmut 2014-07-01 12:26
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL zan 2014-07-01 18:03
- Loosing patience Helmut 2014-07-01 18:23
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL zan 2014-07-01 18:03
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL Helmut 2014-07-01 12:26
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-01 01:15
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 22:22
- To pool or not to poolElMaestro 2014-06-30 22:11
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-01 01:18
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-02 19:56
- To pool or not to pool ElMaestro 2014-07-03 00:17
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-03 00:36
- sequence- / period effect #666 Helmut 2014-07-03 10:05
- To pool or not to pool ElMaestro 2014-07-03 00:17
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:46
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 21:38
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:02
- Group effect commonly not relevant AngusMcLean 2014-07-06 16:19
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 20:32
- Group effect commonly not relevant AngusMcLean 2014-07-06 22:52
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 23:57
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 15:04
- PHX: Parameter mapping Helmut 2014-07-07 15:45
- PHX: Parameter mapping Shuanghe 2014-07-07 17:35
- Great hint! Helmut 2014-07-07 17:54
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 20:49
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 18:46
- PHX: Parameter mapping Shuanghe 2014-07-07 17:35
- PHX: Parameter mapping Helmut 2014-07-07 15:45
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 15:04
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 23:57
- Group effect commonly not relevant AngusMcLean 2014-07-06 22:52
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 20:32
- Group effect in 2x2 BE study zan 2014-06-30 19:18