Group effect in 2x2 BE study [Software]

posted by zan – US, 2014-06-30 21:18 (3948 d 11:56 ago) – Posting: # 13175
Views: 27,238

Thanks very much for the useful reply, ElMaestro and Helmut! Yes I am using Phoenix Winnonlin to work on this analysis. If there is a significant treatment*Group effect, is the overall (all subject) ratio (CI90%) still valid, or we have to adopt the ratio (CI90%) from separate groups?

Regarding FDA's requirement below (equiva­lence be demonstrated in one of the groups), do we have a link to the source of the letter? I am hoping to keep it as a reference for study files.

❝ If the Treatment-by-Group term is not significant (p ≥0.1) this term can be dropped from the model, proceeding to Group Model II.

❝ If the Treatment-by-Group term is significant (p <0.1), FDA’s Division of Bioequivalence requests that equiva­lence be demonstrated in one of the groups, provided that the group meets minimum requirements for a com­plete BE study (i.e., 12).


Best regards
zan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
25 visitors (0 registered, 25 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The true Enlightenment thinker, the true rationalist,
never wants to talk anyone into anything.
No, he does not even want to convince;
all the time he is aware that he may be wrong.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5