Phoenix WNL to handle 2x2 crossover study with multip group [Software]
I don't speak WNL but:
❝ 1. is it acceptable to just assign 4 periods to the 4 dosing days? If so,
❝ In the model specification: Treatment+Sequence+Period
❝ and in the variance structure--Random effect: Subject(Sequence)
.
That would be a little untraditional with four period levels. But it can be done and it is a little like working with period in group. What's the title of your study? (If it is something like "A two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence bioequivalence study blah blah" then you almost have the answer right there).
❝ 2. Can we still keep these 2 periods and add a Group term to these subjects (eg. Group 1 and Group 2)?. If so, in the model specification:
❝ Treatment+Sequence+Period+Group
Yes, much better, this is what I would do.
❝ but in the variance structure, I dont know what is appropriate to be added in the Random effect field. Should it be Subject(Sequence*Group)
.
Oh here we go again: Depending on your data listing you can probably just write Subject.
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- Phoenix WNL to handle 2x2 crossover study with multip group zan 2014-06-27 23:29
- Phoenix WNL to handle 2x2 crossover study with multip groupElMaestro 2014-06-28 23:23
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-06-30 16:55
- Group effect in 2x2 BE study zan 2014-06-30 19:18
- Group effect in 2x2 BE study ElMaestro 2014-06-30 20:36
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 20:51
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:02
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 21:38
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:46
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 22:22
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-01 01:15
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL Helmut 2014-07-01 12:26
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL zan 2014-07-01 18:03
- Loosing patience Helmut 2014-07-01 18:23
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL zan 2014-07-01 18:03
- Partial vs. sequential tests in WNL Helmut 2014-07-01 12:26
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-01 01:15
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 22:22
- To pool or not to pool ElMaestro 2014-06-30 22:11
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-01 01:18
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-02 19:56
- To pool or not to pool ElMaestro 2014-07-03 00:17
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-07-03 00:36
- sequence- / period effect #666 Helmut 2014-07-03 10:05
- To pool or not to pool ElMaestro 2014-07-03 00:17
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:46
- To pool or not to pool Helmut 2014-06-30 21:38
- To pool or not to pool zan 2014-06-30 21:02
- Group effect commonly not relevant AngusMcLean 2014-07-06 16:19
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 20:32
- Group effect commonly not relevant AngusMcLean 2014-07-06 22:52
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 23:57
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 15:04
- PHX: Parameter mapping Helmut 2014-07-07 15:45
- PHX: Parameter mapping Shuanghe 2014-07-07 17:35
- Great hint! Helmut 2014-07-07 17:54
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 20:49
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 18:46
- PHX: Parameter mapping Shuanghe 2014-07-07 17:35
- PHX: Parameter mapping Helmut 2014-07-07 15:45
- PHX: Parameter mapping AngusMcLean 2014-07-07 15:04
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 23:57
- Group effect commonly not relevant AngusMcLean 2014-07-06 22:52
- Group effect commonly not relevant Helmut 2014-07-06 20:32
- Group effect in 2x2 BE study zan 2014-06-30 19:18