lm() or lme() for 2x2x2 study design? [Software]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2014-02-04 14:09 (4527 d 15:27 ago) – Posting: # 12335
Views: 32,601

(edited on 2014-02-04 17:06)

Dear ElMaestro and all,

Thanks for your messages and good to hear that. The reason I asked was that it would be related to how I would modify bear later. BTW, results obtained from R's lme() may differ from that from SAS's PROC MIXED. As I ran lme() with the dataset that I provided before, I got different MSE (0.0244=0.15620852), CVintra(15.7%) and V(subj(seq)) (1.11*10-06)2 for AUC0-tfrom that using SAS's PROC MIXED as posted by Detlew. I still check with my codes to see if I do anything wrong.

❝ [...]

❝ So lm and not lme for 2,2,2-BE.


All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.6:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
320 visitors (0 registered, 320 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5