References [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-02-02 10:56 (4519 d 13:54 ago) – Posting: # 12315
Views: 32,523

Thanks Helmut,

once again I am sort of baffled.
I have to admit that I actually thought MSsubj was a direct measure of intersubject variability. Plenty of room for improvement at my end, it seems.

RCA: I don't understand because my brain is walnut-sized.
CAPA: I shall stop trying to understand.

Can we possibly do an lm on Test only with Sequence and Period as fixed and take the MSE as some measure of total variance (between+within), then do the same for Ref only, then at the end pool (or average) the two variance estimates to obtain some kind of total variability, from which we then derive a between by subtracting the within stemming from the grand analysis with subj, seq, per, and trt?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
107 visitors (0 registered, 107 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5