References [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-02-02 10:56 (4113 d 12:46 ago) – Posting: # 12315
Views: 27,710

Thanks Helmut,

once again I am sort of baffled.
I have to admit that I actually thought MSsubj was a direct measure of intersubject variability. Plenty of room for improvement at my end, it seems.

RCA: I don't understand because my brain is walnut-sized.
CAPA: I shall stop trying to understand.

Can we possibly do an lm on Test only with Sequence and Period as fixed and take the MSE as some measure of total variance (between+within), then do the same for Ref only, then at the end pool (or average) the two variance estimates to obtain some kind of total variability, from which we then derive a between by subtracting the within stemming from the grand analysis with subj, seq, per, and trt?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
160 visitors (0 registered, 160 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5