References [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-02-02 10:56 (4097 d 05:55 ago) – Posting: # 12315
Views: 27,620

Thanks Helmut,

once again I am sort of baffled.
I have to admit that I actually thought MSsubj was a direct measure of intersubject variability. Plenty of room for improvement at my end, it seems.

RCA: I don't understand because my brain is walnut-sized.
CAPA: I shall stop trying to understand.

Can we possibly do an lm on Test only with Sequence and Period as fixed and take the MSE as some measure of total variance (between+within), then do the same for Ref only, then at the end pool (or average) the two variance estimates to obtain some kind of total variability, from which we then derive a between by subtracting the within stemming from the grand analysis with subj, seq, per, and trt?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
15 visitors (0 registered, 15 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The true Enlightenment thinker, the true rationalist,
never wants to talk anyone into anything.
No, he does not even want to convince;
all the time he is aware that he may be wrong.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5