Just thinking loud [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-02-01 20:02 (4514 d 14:22 ago) – Posting: # 12309
Views: 32,716

(edited on 2014-02-02 01:27)

Thanks Yung-jin,

❝ ❝ "MSSubject(seq)-MSResidual" enter the game?


❝ Should be this (as presented values in my previous post), I guess.



Here I am thinking loud, and usually nothing good results when I do it. But here goes:


By way of a typical anova (forget for a moment the case of imbalance and type III SS which is irrelevant anyway for the actual dataset example) we have:

SStot=SStrt+SSseq+SSper+SSsubj+SSres
where
MSsubj=SSsubj/(n-2) [n=total number of subjects counting both sequences]
and

MSres= SSres/(n-2).

I want to know what the color and taste of "MSsubj-MSres" as prescribed above is:
MSsubj=SSsubj/(n-2)
or
MSsubj=(SStot-SStrt-SSseq-SSper-SSres)/(n-2)


Then
"MSsubj-MSres" = (SStot-SStrt-SSseq-SSper-SSres)/(n-2) - SSres/(n-2)
= (SStot-SStrt-SSseq-SSper-2*SSres)/(n-2)
This is truly a mindf%cker. My brain refuses to cooperate. I am experiencing the cerebral equivalent of a
Proton M rocket launch.
Actually, I am inclined to think there is something wrong with that subtraction in the first place.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
103 visitors (0 registered, 103 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5