Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

PowerTOST Usage [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-07-28 21:06 (4286 d 01:48 ago) – Posting: # 11087
Views: 10,117

Dear Detleffff,

❝ Ok, maybe that your naming proposal fits your need better. Mine was driven from the term standard deviation of error.

No sir With all due respect, I side with Ben here. I think you should follow common naming conventions.
I am not often using PowerTOST but I think that what you are calling 'standard deviation of error' is no such thing. It is a measure of the standard deviation of the mean difference (on the log scale, for the most common use) and as such it could be termed sd or s, but definitely not Standard Error.
In practice we nned to regard the SD as a variability measure, whereas the SE is a measure of how well we have estimated the mean (slash mean difference). The two are related but different.

Complete thread:

• Sample size calculation by power-tost software Compliance 2013-07-23 14:09 
  • Sample size estimation with PowerTOST d_labes 2013-07-23 16:23
    • PowerTOST Usage Ben 2013-07-28 13:08
      • PowerTOST naming issues d_labes 2013-07-28 18:00
        • PowerTOST UsageElMaestro 2013-07-28 19:06
          • Common naming conventions of EM d_labes 2013-07-28 19:30
            • Common naming conventions of EM ElMaestro 2013-07-28 19:40
        • PowerTOST naming issues Ben 2013-07-29 17:04
  • Error description? Helmut 2013-07-23 16:27
    • Error description? Compliance 2013-07-29 05:46