Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • SAS vs Winnonlin

SAS vs Winnonlin [Software]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2013-07-25 01:53 (4289 d 19:36 ago) – Posting: # 11058
Views: 17,896

Hi John,

❝ It is a 3-way 2 test vs reference study (tada! You guessed it! We have common/pool variance!)

❝ Well the data I have is not complete, one subject is missing period 3 (withdrew) but I elected to keep his periods 1 and 2 data since period 2 was the reference arm. I used GLM in SAS and then for my own amusement I ran the data in Phoenix...

If you are walking the fun road already: You can feed the incomplete data to PROC MIXED and the other way ’round the complete to PHX. You should see again different results, but in reversed order.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

SAS vs Winnonlin jag009 2013-07-24 17:30
- SAS vs Winnonlin Helmut 2013-07-24 17:55
  - SAS vs Winnonlin jag009 2013-07-24 22:56
    - SAS vs WinnonlinHelmut 2013-07-24 23:53
      - SAS vs Winnonlin jag009 2013-07-25 00:56
        
        EMA crippled approach d_labes 2013-07-25 09:13
        
        Hypothesis jag009 2013-07-25 15:38
        
        Two at a Time? Or All at Once? Helmut 2013-08-10 13:52
        
        Heteroscedasticity Helmut 2013-07-27 18:30
  - Update! jag009 2013-07-27 05:59
    - Rounding limbo? Helmut 2013-07-27 14:53
      - Rounding limbo? jag009 2013-07-27 22:02
  - Winnonlin: exclude volunteers mittyri 2014-01-10 08:05
    - Winnonlin: exclude incomplete data! Helmut 2014-01-10 13:41
- SAS vs Winnonlin ElMaestro 2013-07-24 18:06
  - SAS vs Winnonlin jag009 2013-07-24 22:59