3-trt study? [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-07-05 00:37 (4386 d 00:26 ago) – Posting: # 10941
Views: 12,115

Hi Helmut,

thanks for the comments.
In perspective, could this methodology then be extended to a 3-treatment parallel study (e.g. US Ref, EU Ref, Test)? I am thinking we'd just need another sigma squared on the diagonal and then be good to go? If that's the case then the WNL approach –however counterintuitive and retarded it might seem– could provide a solution to a problem which cannot be resolved by the standard t-test approach?
Oh and by the way, I think this would imply that the denominator DFs would have to be calculated from treatment A, B as well as C, when a 90% CI for A/B is constructed - that's perhaps also worthy of a heated debate further down the road...?

:pirate:

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,686 registered users;
73 visitors (0 registered, 73 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5