3-trt study? [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-07-05 00:37 (4717 d 23:57 ago) – Posting: # 10941
Views: 13,533

Hi Helmut,

thanks for the comments.
In perspective, could this methodology then be extended to a 3-treatment parallel study (e.g. US Ref, EU Ref, Test)? I am thinking we'd just need another sigma squared on the diagonal and then be good to go? If that's the case then the WNL approach –however counterintuitive and retarded it might seem– could provide a solution to a problem which cannot be resolved by the standard t-test approach?
Oh and by the way, I think this would imply that the denominator DFs would have to be calculated from treatment A, B as well as C, when a 90% CI for A/B is constructed - that's perhaps also worthy of a heated debate further down the road...?

:pirate:

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
135 visitors (0 registered, 135 guests [including 44 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5