NIST; cross-validation [Software]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2013-07-04 01:47 (4727 d 14:08 ago) – Posting: # 10931
Views: 45,843

Dear Helmut,

❝ If Elba will succeed in convincing NIST of its importance we will have one… ;-)


Agree.

❝ Note that NIST’s datasets do not necessarily represent the “truth”, only the “best-available” solutions. [...]



I see. But it has been good enough for comparing nonlinear regression software.

❝ Why? If you compare bear’s results with the published ones you don’t have to have the software which generated them.


To purchase commercial software to do validation first. The textbook or published papers may have final results in Tables for their dataset, but do not have whole detailed output results.


❝ P.S.: Yung-jin added the validation to bear’s website (162 pages, 4.45 MB). Now it’s up to the user to compare the different programs’ output. BTW: WinNonlin Pro 4.01, but which versions of bear and SAS?


bear was v2.4.0 (p.92) and SAS should be v9.1.3 I guessed when I was at KMU (university license).

All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.6:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
130 visitors (0 registered, 130 guests [including 35 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5