Phoenix and Proc. GLM [Software]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2013-05-11 06:51 (4364 d 19:28 ago) – Posting: # 10570
Views: 3,764

Helmut: Thank you for your response. Yes; I do have one data set that I ran for BE in WinNonlin some years ago and also ran in a version of SAS (SAS LE).

It is a 3-way X over design with 6 sequences (so it is balanced). I ran it in SAS GLM and WinNonlin. The BE results were exactly the same. No subjects dropped out.

I am looking for such a data set and BE results of an example like above run in SAS Proc Mixed so I can compare with Phoenix Nonlin. I have Chow and Liu's book, but examples are limited. I do not see a Proc-Mixed example. Any idea of where I could find such an example.

Angus


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
19 visitors (0 registered, 19 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5