Profile check first! [Tips / Tricks]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-11-13 16:47 (5681 d 18:33 ago) – Posting: # 6146
Views: 23,517

Dear Luv(blooms)!

One additional note: Check the time-course in a multiple dose study as suggested by Yung-jin in his first post. If you don’t see a deviation from linear PK, stop worrying about trying to fit any (!) model. If a change in clearance(s) is not reflected in plasma concentrations, no model will work (i.e. converge).

Example modified from Danielsson/Weiner (4th ed. pp. 684–90), Autoinduction, two-compartment PK.

[image]

Single dose study; 1 h infusion of 40 mg (bottom left). It was decided based on a simulation (top green line) to start the multiple dose study with a 1 h infusion of 120 mg as a loading dose, followed by 0.5 h infusions of 40 mg (τ = 8 h). What we see, is autoinduction which lead roughly after the second day to equilibrium of only ≈50 % of predicted from the simple model (without autoinduction).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
451 visitors (0 registered, 451 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5