BCS Class III molecule Fed Study [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by Srinetram – India, 2010-05-21 10:54 (5873 d 23:33 ago) – Posting: # 5362
Views: 5,908

(edited on 2010-05-21 11:46)

Dear Raghu,

Thanks a lot for your response.
We have done the investigation and observed that

❝ 1. Comparison of dissolution data for Pilot batch and Pivotal batch (Pilot Batch >>>> Exhibit Batch)

Its same (more than 90% release in 10 min in all the media e,g 0.1, 0.01, 4.5, 5.8 FeSSIF, FeSSIL V2)

❝ 2. Study Conduct (Fed Breakfast) for Pilot and Pivotal

It is same.

❝ 3. Bio-analytical method validation and Analysis

Even this one is same

Now, we did a repeated biostudy in Fed condition and Bingo!!!
The problem is solved and we got a T/R of more than 100%. ( :confused:)
Only changes we made in the protocol was an additional 24 hr housing before dose to minimise the GI empty related variabilites.

This time, there were no double peaks too.

Now what to do?? (:surprised:)

Does any one have any expirence of submitting this sort of studies?
Can we justify the redosing study on the basis of variable GI motility??


Edit: Please use the standard quoting system of the forum. BTW, why did you test pH 0.01 (impossible in humans)? [Jaime]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
156 visitors (0 registered, 156 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5