BE waiver for tablet after reducing % of API [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2009-05-19 21:29 (6237 d 10:10 ago) – Posting: # 3711
Views: 7,077

Dear Gary!

❝ I want to reformulate as my company has submitted this to regulatory authorities and they have asked the reasons for overages.


Do I get you right: the test used in the BE-study was intentionally formulated to a content 104%? If yes, this was a bad idea. If it was formulated to 100% and only the actual content (analysis of the final product) came out with 104%, nothing to worry about. Please clarify.

❝ Moreover my company wants to reformulate it without overage and with only 100%API.


Just out of couriosity: why was the product formulated to 104%?

❝ I want to know if it is possible to avoid bioequivalence study of tablet if we reduce % of API and how much percentage of variability is allowed.


What BCS Class is your drug in? Should be possible for Classes I & III, and tricky for Class II - impossible for Class IV.

❝ please tell if there is any european or ICH guideline to this issue.


Have a look at the relevant BE-Guidelines here (BA/BE 2001, Q&A document 2006, BE-draft 2008).
There are no ICH-guidelines on BE (and no intentions to come up with one).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
143 visitors (0 registered, 143 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5