Justifications for discrepancy in dissolution vs. BE study [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by gtomer – Israel, 2014-04-09 16:40 (4455 d 06:43 ago) – Posting: # 12799
Views: 7,450

Hi All,

Would value your opinion:

The bioequivalence guide (CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401 Rev 1) requests to perform a dissolution profile comparison at 3 pHs between the test and reference products used in the BE study.
It gives superiority to the BE study results, should the dissolution profiles will not be similar, "However, possible reasons for the discrepancy should be addressed and justified.".

Does anyone know of any investigatory methods or justifications found for such discrepancy, i.e. where reference vs. test found similar in BE study but F2>50 in dissolution?

Many thanks.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
128 visitors (0 registered, 128 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5