CVtotal ≠ CVinter № 42 [Power / Sample Size]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2013-01-12 16:31 (4909 d 16:23 ago) – Posting: # 9832
Views: 6,188

Helmut: Thank you; that is an excellent slide you refer me to. Yes convolution is not good. I do agree combination is better.

The term shown in the slide MSEB is the Between subject mean square error term from a crossover study and denotes Between subject mean square error term from the ANOVA of that study. This ANOVA term is a misnomer, since it contains a combination of between subject error mean square error and within subject mean square error terms. That is why you have to make the subtraction for inter that you show in the slide.

Do you agree with misnomer.

Angus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
110 visitors (0 registered, 110 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5