understanding about power in bioequivalence [Power / Sample Size]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2012-09-27 14:41 (5013 d 20:54 ago) – Posting: # 9268
Views: 4,390

Hi Joystar

❝ i have just joined this forum to learn pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis in Bio-equivalence. i read about power and errors in bioequivalence. i don't understand why the power is 80% not 90 or 70.


Power is the chance of showing bioequivalence under your own assumptions of product performance. It is therefore unrelated to patient's risk.
For this reason, there is no strict regulatory requirement about power. If it is too low (too few subjects) then the study may be futile. If the power is too high you may be including more subjects than necessary for the given purpose.
So, many companies select 80% - this is just an empirical choice based on a tradeoff between chance of success and risk of failure. 90% is also commonly used. 70% is in my opinion slightly more rare as it involves a failure risk of 30%.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
142 visitors (0 registered, 142 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5