understanding about power in bioequivalence [Power / Sample Size]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2012-09-27 14:41 (5023 d 01:17 ago) – Posting: # 9268
Views: 4,424

Hi Joystar

❝ i have just joined this forum to learn pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis in Bio-equivalence. i read about power and errors in bioequivalence. i don't understand why the power is 80% not 90 or 70.


Power is the chance of showing bioequivalence under your own assumptions of product performance. It is therefore unrelated to patient's risk.
For this reason, there is no strict regulatory requirement about power. If it is too low (too few subjects) then the study may be futile. If the power is too high you may be including more subjects than necessary for the given purpose.
So, many companies select 80% - this is just an empirical choice based on a tradeoff between chance of success and risk of failure. 90% is also commonly used. 70% is in my opinion slightly more rare as it involves a failure risk of 30%.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
248 visitors (0 registered, 248 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5