Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Paired designs not that uncommon

Paired designs not that uncommon [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2011-12-12 18:05 (5309 d 22:51 ago) – Posting: # 7773
Views: 11,163

Dear Detlew!

❝ […] It's my un-validated extended code for PowerTOST :cool: . All you out there: Drop me an E-mail if this is helpful for you and I will incorporate the code in the next release. Guaranteed.

Yes, pleeze! Would be useful for studies where a multiple dose profile is compared to single dose. Haven’t seen (and would not like to see) one as a cross-over (aka logistical nightmare).

❝ OwenQ is up to now not findable in the function dictionary of SAS 9.2 TS2M0, which I have to use (released last year if I remember correctly). They call Proc Power meanwhile production :-D .

Fascinating. So it’s still some kind of “Jack-in-the-(black)-box”.

@All: Can we use an undocumented (!) function (of any software), even if we validate it against published datasets or other software?

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Sample size calculations: SAS vs PowerTOST/FARTSSIE Oiinkie 2011-12-06 14:30
- Sample size calculations: SAS vs PowerTOST/FARTSSIE Helmut 2011-12-06 14:49
  - Sample size calculations: SAS vs PowerTOST/FARTSSIE Oiinkie 2011-12-07 15:57
    - The power not to know vs PowerTOST/FARTSSIE/... d_labes 2011-12-12 15:38
      - Paired designs not that uncommonHelmut 2011-12-12 17:05
        
        Paired designs not that uncommon ElMaestro 2011-12-13 17:04
        
        Off topic: software validation Helmut 2011-12-13 18:10
        
        Off topic: software validation ElMaestro 2011-12-13 20:30
        
        Off topic: software validation Helmut 2011-12-14 14:14
        
        Discovery of Owen's Q in SAS d_labes 2011-12-14 15:34
      - Paired designs in PowerTOST 0.9-0 Helmut 2011-12-19 20:05