Sample size calculations: SAS vs PowerTOST/FARTSSIE [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-12-06 15:49 (5320 d 04:18 ago) – Posting: # 7761
Views: 11,561

Dear Oiinkie!

❝ At the moment, we are having a discussion with a CRO on sample size calculations and which software to use. I have recommended PowerTOST and FARTSSIE, but they want to stick with SAS (because “they have always used it” :confused:).


That’s the type of argument I definitely like the most. In line with “We have used bloodletting for 2000 years – can’t be wrong.” Quackery!

❝ This would be fine with me as long as all calculations match, but they do not.


Shouldn’t be such a big difference? See here and there.

❝ How can I convince the CRO to also look into the possibilities of using other software besides SAS and that sample sizes calculated with SAS are not (always) the "correct" approximations?


Well, you are the boss. :-D

❝ And, what to do with (how to approach) different outcomes (SAS vs others)?


Stick with the best. @Detlew: Is Proc Power still ‘experimental’ and/or are Owen’s functions documented in the meantime?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,571 registered users;
347 visitors (0 registered, 347 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5