When does power become unethical? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2011-11-02 13:01 (5353 d 06:28 ago) – Posting: # 7583
Views: 9,526

Dear Dr_Dan,

❝ I do not really understand this discussion. Is there really a need for setting a limit for the prospective power of a study?

❝ A) The prospective power is based on an assumption of an intra-subject variability. As you know the CV% varies from study to study and you will never find the one and only information that for elmaestromycin the true CV is 23.765%.


Yes. And you'll be completely hallucinated after 5 mg.

❝ B) From the sponsorś perspective why should I ask for further restrictions?


I agree that it is often a good idea to avoid complications.

❝ C) Where is the scientific basis telling you that a prospective power of 69% is futile and a power of 71% is reasonable? When does power become unethical?


There isn't any scientific justification for a limit as far as I know. This is like the 5% significance limit commonly accepted in statistics, or the 100 km/hr speed limit on Danish high ways, or the 80%-125% BE acceptance range, or the limits for cucumber curvature. They are arbitrary.

Best regards,
EM.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
303 visitors (0 registered, 303 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5