ethics and power [Power / Sample Size]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2011-11-01 11:46 (5345 d 02:05 ago) – Posting: # 7573
Views: 9,470

Good morning d_labes,

very interesting, I think two of our perspectives here differ.

❝ But at the end it's a question what risk of erroneous not concluding BE the sponsor is willing to accept.

For me at the end it is more about how low the power can be before ethics committees etc will flag trials as futile.

❝ But I would not give a cut-off value as futile because I think that a target power of f.i. 0.778 is equal sufficient like 0.8.

Personally, I would be inclined to think that if regulators want a 90% CI with two decimals then we should consider power in a similar strict fashion since there's an ethics perspective involved.

❝ (...) the sensitivity analysis of sample size planning Helmut is not tired to preach every time.

Yeah, that guy talks a bloody lot doesn't he?

:-D
EM.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
207 visitors (0 registered, 207 guests [including 71 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5