When is a BE study futile? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2011-11-01 10:59 (5343 d 14:35 ago) – Posting: # 7570
Views: 9,454

Hi Dr_Dan,

❝ What about an add-on design?


:-D You are reading my thoughts, I think.
A background for my question is that I am fiddling a teenytiny bit with two-stage designs like those of Potvin et al. In the second step the target nominal power is 80% but due to the nature of the approach this figure is in some cases not achieved. Thus if we can define a realistic bsolute lower limit for power then we can tweak the method parameters so as to keep power above the magical or arbitrary threshold.
More info to follow, I hope.

Best regards,
EM.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
121 visitors (0 registered, 121 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Actually, science starts to become interesting
only where it ends.    Justus von Liebig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5