Expected deviation in sample size estimation [Power / Sample Size]

posted by GSTATS Homepage – India, 2011-06-13 09:36 (5496 d 04:02 ago) – Posting: # 7111
Views: 6,847

Dear Skar

❝ The reason for my doubt (Normally we use Expected deviation of 5% or 7.5% in sample size calculation for bioequivalence study. please suggest me the maximum Expected deviation that can be used for sample size calculation?) is:


Maximum Expected deviation can be used depending on the situation, literature, pilot study or sponsor's point of view. I have seen studies, accepted by regulatory, planned on sample size caculated with expected deviation of 10% or sometimes more. For example, if a pilot study shows a deviation of 10% and variability around 15%. Then one can plan a study with sample size based on 10% expected deviation, variability=15%, power=80% or 90% (on your choice).

But i will suggest that if expected deviation (from pilot study) is =>15% then one should definetly go for reformulation. But if one is expecting deviation to be between 10% to 15% then variability of the molecule should be low (shown in literature or pilot study).

Regards,
GSTATS
www.gstatsolutions.com

Let Noble Thoughts come from Every Side: RIG VEDA

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
328 visitors (0 registered, 328 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5