A posteriori power - No.666 [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-03-08 14:41 (5589 d 11:52 ago) – Posting: # 6722
Views: 8,336

Dear Marcel!

❝ ❝ The CMS was not by any chance Greece?


They still do, but they withdrew their objection (it was in a different DCP).


Unbelievable! :crying:

❝ I pointed to a paper by Hoenig and Hensey you also quote at the end of your presentation [...]. But they just tried to use it against us, but I couldn't follow their logic, since it basically contradicted their stance that post hoc power has meaning.


❝ This is the wording they are using: The reduced number of the enrolled subject confers to the study a weak perspective power (just above 0.5). Therefore the BE evaluation could not be reliable.


Crazy. I guess you planned (!) for power of ≥80% and suffered from one of the followings (or any combination thereof)?
  1. CVintra higher than expected,
  2. higher drop-out rate than anticipated,
  3. T/R deviating more from 1 than expected.
BTW, if you look at power curves #1 and #2 are less painful than #3…

I’m not sure what they mean by:

❝ The reduced number of the enrolled subject...


I hope you suffered from #2 above. If you really enrolled less subjects than planned, this might be of ethical concerns - but still does not invalidate the study.

❝ I'm trying to figure out if they are talking about producer or consumer risk here.


Likely about the former. The latter is fixed at 5% (see ElMaestro’s nice answer).

❝ Therefore the BE evaluation could not be reliable.


Nuts! If you initiated the study with power “just above 0.5” that’s bad practice. You took a high risk of failure – and succeeded. If you were a victim of #2 nothing to worry about.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
390 visitors (0 registered, 390 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5