75% confidence... [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-03-19 15:12 (5941 d 16:39 ago) – Posting: # 4939
Views: 16,194

Dear D Labes,

you are are right; this is a typo - 5 % is correct.

❝ BTW: I nevertheless are the opinion that a 95% CI is too stringent.


Yes; I re-read the entire chapter - where did I get the 80 % from?!

❝ But have no reference for it. Patterson and Jones cite Gould in this context.


Gould (p.71) uses the upper 75 % confidence bound (Chi²0.25,df).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
134 visitors (0 registered, 134 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5