Different methods/models [Power / Sample Size]
HI every one,
Paired equivalence method:
sample size-> Paired equivalence->multiplicative
1) multiplicative
Cv=0.62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80, LOWER=0.80 UPPER=1.25 then N=72
Cv=62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80, LOWER=80 UPPER=125 then N=1774
sample size-> Paired equivalence->Additive
2) Additive
Cv=0.62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80, LOWER=0.80 UPPER=1.25 then N=108
Cv=62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80, LOWER=80 UPPER=125 then N=108
Two-sample equivalence method:
sample size-> Two-sample equivalence->multiplicative
1) multiplicative
Cv=0.62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80 LOWER=0.80 UPPER=1.25 N=141
Cv=62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80 LOWER=80 UPPER=125 N=3546
sample size-> Two-sample equivalence->Additive
2) Additive
Cv=0.62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80 LOWER=0.80 UPPER=1.25 N=213
Cv=62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80 LOWER=0.80 UPPER=1.25 N=213
which method we have to take for finding sample size in BA/BE. Which method is accepted by regulators. give suggestion to me.
thanks in advance.
suri
--
Edit: Subject line changed; please try to be more specific the next time. Helmut
Paired equivalence method:
sample size-> Paired equivalence->multiplicative
1) multiplicative
Cv=0.62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80, LOWER=0.80 UPPER=1.25 then N=72
Cv=62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80, LOWER=80 UPPER=125 then N=1774
sample size-> Paired equivalence->Additive
2) Additive
Cv=0.62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80, LOWER=0.80 UPPER=1.25 then N=108
Cv=62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80, LOWER=80 UPPER=125 then N=108
Two-sample equivalence method:
sample size-> Two-sample equivalence->multiplicative
1) multiplicative
Cv=0.62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80 LOWER=0.80 UPPER=1.25 N=141
Cv=62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80 LOWER=80 UPPER=125 N=3546
sample size-> Two-sample equivalence->Additive
2) Additive
Cv=0.62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80 LOWER=0.80 UPPER=1.25 N=213
Cv=62 T/R=0.95 POWER=0.80 LOWER=0.80 UPPER=1.25 N=213
which method we have to take for finding sample size in BA/BE. Which method is accepted by regulators. give suggestion to me.
thanks in advance.
suri
--
Edit: Subject line changed; please try to be more specific the next time. Helmut
Complete thread:
- Different methods/modelsjagsuraiah 2009-03-30 13:16
- Suitable methods/models Helmut 2009-03-30 14:08
- Suitable methods/models jagsuraiah 2009-03-31 12:01
- Suitable methods/models MGR 2009-04-01 08:24
- Suitable methods/models LKN 2009-04-01 10:44
- Suitable methods/models MGR 2009-04-01 14:46
- Acceptance limits: high=1/low Helmut 2009-04-01 15:06
- Suitable methods/models MGR 2009-04-01 14:46
- Suitable methods/models LKN 2009-04-01 10:44
- Suitable methods/models MGR 2009-04-01 08:24
- Suitable methods/models jagsuraiah 2009-03-31 12:01
- Suitable methods/models Helmut 2009-03-30 14:08
