Sample size calculation in canadian study [Power / Sample Size]

posted by KR – India, 2009-03-18 13:35 (6301 d 05:24 ago) – Posting: # 3377
Views: 3,183

Dear all,
As per canadian guidelines, for IR drugs, BE criteria is

  1. The 90% confidence interval of the ratio of least squares means for ln-transformed pharmacokinetic parameter AUCT falls with in the acceptance range of 80.00 – 125.00%.
  2. The ratio of least squares means of test and reference formulation for Cmax on ln-transformed scale should be within 80.00 – 125.00 %.
Now, for sample size calculation, which parameter's intra-subject variability should be considered as 90% CI is only applicable for AUCT only?

Should we consider intra-subject variablity of AUCT parameter only for calculating sample size or we should consider both parameters' intra-subject variability for sample size i.e. Cmax and AUCT as 90% CI criteria is not applicable for Cmax parameter?

Waiting for valuable reply soon.

With regards,

KR

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
152 visitors (0 registered, 152 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5