in vivo ≠ in vitro [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Mithu – India, 2022-07-25 15:26 (1426 d 11:42 ago) – Posting: # 23175
Views: 6,478

❝ As per regulatory acceptance- it is either acceptable or unacceptable. So is not best to describe it as marginally acceptable.


Just to make it clear that I am trying to say that study is passing at 80.5% lower CI.

❝ The in vitro assessment with recent batches of reference is important and also performing a comparative dissolution with older lot (if still available) can be useful.


❝ Taking only larger size without consideration of in vitro assessment will not solve your problem.


Thank you.

Regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
128 visitors (0 registered, 128 guests [including 30 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5