power_TOST vs. statistical power of the ANOVA [Power / Sample Size]

posted by MCelestino – Mexico, 2019-01-03 23:05 (2722 d 08:17 ago) – Posting: # 19725
Views: 6,450

(edited on 2019-01-05 02:33)

In the results it is also evident that the post-hoc statistical power (power_TOST) is less than 80%, this is because the estimated point is greater than 105%, considering that the sample size was estimated expecting a difference less than / equal to 5%. However, the statistical power of the ANOVA (Power_80_20) supports that the sample size used in the study was adequate, since the values ​​are greater than 90%.

This is true?


Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Mittyri]
Please don’t shout[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
179 visitors (0 registered, 179 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5