TIE for NTIDs [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-02-05 18:49 (3066 d 03:36 ago) – Posting: # 18355
Views: 26,346

Dear Detlew,

❝ Only one nitpicking:


❝ I think the entries under signif

p<0.05 should read p>0.05.


Hhm, why? I’m testing at the 5% level for a significant inflation. The limit for 106 sim’s is
binom.test(0.05*1e6, 1e6, alternative="less")$conf.int[2]
[1] 0.05035995

Hence, any TIE > this value should be significant.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
374 visitors (0 registered, 374 guests [including 81 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5