Reference-scaling: USE PowerTOST [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Astea – Russia, 2017-12-01 15:16 (2704 d 14:20 ago) – Posting: # 18031
Views: 15,721

Dear Helmut!

Thank you for enlightening this question!

The advantage of R is doubtless. I just wanted to show FARTSSIE not worser than other rude methods of sample size estimation (remember nomogram and so on).

(Sorry, I've made a mistake in the previous post, the data from the paper refers to partial replicate design 2x3x3.)

By the way, for extreme numbers from the paper by Endrényi L, Tóthfalusi L. we also get slightly underpowered study:

power.scABEL(CV=0.8,n=54,theta0=0.95,design="2x3x3")
[1] 0.79917
power.scABEL(CV=0.8,n=72,theta0=0.9,design="2x3x3")
[1] 0.79782

"Being in minority, even a minority of one, did not make you mad"

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
94 visitors (0 registered, 94 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5