T/R ratio for estimation of sample size in BE study of NTI drugs [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-10-25 01:15 (3165 d 09:01 ago) – Posting: # 17917
Views: 9,387

Salam Mahmoud,

❝ Pease, advise me about what is the best T/R ratio to be used for estimating sample size for a BE study of NTI drugs? knowing that the GL to be followed set the 90% CI acceptance range to (90-111.11) for Cmax if a "2x2x2" design be followed.

❝ I'm confused to use T/R ratio of 0.95 or 0.975?!


Both are fine. Note that the FDA requires tighter batch release spec’s for NTIDs. Hence, in function sampleN.NTID() of PowerTOST the default is 0.975 – contrary to the usual 0.95.

library(PowerTOST)
sampleN.NTID(CV = 0.0945)

+++++++++++ FDA method for NTIDs ++++++++++++
           Sample size estimation
---------------------------------------------
Study design:  2x2x4 (TRTR|RTRT)
log-transformed data (multiplicative model)
1e+05 studies for each step simulated.

alpha  = 0.05, target power = 0.8
CVw(T) = 0.0945, CVw(R) = 0.0945
True ratio     = 0.975
ABE limits     = 0.8 ... 1.25
Implied scABEL = 0.9054 ... 1.1044
Regulatory settings: FDA
- Regulatory const. = 1.053605
- 'CVcap'           = 0.2142

Sample size search
 n     power
16   0.777210
18   0.831050

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
145 visitors (0 registered, 145 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5