CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by nobody – 2017-08-07 21:52 (3238 d 11:14 ago) – Posting: # 17675
Views: 11,011

❝ ❝ Any thoughts on this approach?


❝ Outright bizarre.


Good, so I'm not alone...

❝ Since the authors are of a CRO, maybe the love failed studies in order to repeat them? Do you have a copy to share?


Would not spend a single cent on such a nonsense. How does somethink like that survive peer review?

Now that is published it will be referenced and used as "scientific basis" for further conclusions/studies. Nightmare. How to get such trash retracted?

***deeply depressed***

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
143 visitors (0 registered, 143 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5