Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut  – Vienna, Austria, 2017-08-07 20:40 (3236 d 03:25 ago) – Posting: # 17674
Views: 11,095

Hi nobody,

❝ Found this here:

❝ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28257283

❝ […] if I understand this correctly, the authors say, CVintra for Cmax is generally higher than for AUC, therefore use AUC to estimate the sample size of your study.

Ah – the formerly pink, now black journal.

❝ Did I get this right?

At least this is what the last sentence of the abstract says: “Hence, CV derived from AUC instead of C_max should be used in sample-size calculation to achieve a sufficient, yet practical, test power.
”

❝ Any thoughts on this approach?

Outright bizarre. Since the authors are of a CRO, maybe the love failed studies in order to repeat them? Do you have a copy to share?

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! 
Helmut Schütz


The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

• CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? nobody 2017-08-07 17:14 
  • CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size?Helmut 2017-08-07 18:40
    • CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? nobody 2017-08-07 19:52
      • Crap… Helmut 2017-08-07 20:29
        • Crap… nobody 2017-08-07 21:31
  • CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? ElMaestro 2017-08-07 23:04
    • CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? nobody 2017-08-08 10:06
  • CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? jag009 2017-08-09 06:21
    • CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? nobody 2017-08-09 17:11