Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

Why not? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Jay – India, 2015-11-02 12:29 (3884 d 08:26 ago) – Posting: # 15599
Views: 8,744

Dear d_labes,

Thanks for the response.

If CV of one parameter such as AUC5-t is observed more than 100% while for other parameter such as Cmax, Auc0-5 or AUCinf is within 20-30%. So should one go for full replicate design and sample size estimation based on highest CV observed as 114%.

Regard,
Jay

Complete thread:

Sample size with CV more than 100% Jay 2015-11-02 10:47
- Why not? d_labes 2015-11-02 11:08
  - Why not?Jay 2015-11-02 11:29
    - Sample size for HVD's d_labes 2015-11-02 13:06
      - EMA: MR – ABEL for partial AUCs Helmut 2015-11-02 14:35
        
        EMA: MR – ABEL for partial AUCs d_labes 2015-11-02 14:48

Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
126 visitors (0 registered, 126 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic. Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz