Lousy review process [Power / Sample Size]

posted by nobody – 2015-05-28 17:53 (4041 d 19:07 ago) – Posting: # 14872
Views: 13,979

❝ Even in a fancy bioanalytic method we rarely see a CV of <5%. 4.4% of Cmax in a parallel design? Gimme a break. :not really:


OT, but slightly on topic, maybe, at least a little bit:

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
112 visitors (0 registered, 112 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5