Reported 99.98%, correct 1.4% [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-02-23 18:38 (4133 d 05:16 ago) – Posting: # 14491
Views: 17,801

Hi Monica,

❝ I'm sorry if I didn't get it correctly, but this is what I mean […]



Excuse my French, but this synopsis is crap. The CV for free ezetimibe’s AUC0-t is 20.5% (assuming 25/24 subjects in the sequences). Bloody irrelevant post hoc power is ~1.4% – not 99.98%!

Try:

library(PowerTOST)
lower <- 0.7295
upper <- 0.8372
n     <- 49
GMR   <- sqrt(lower*upper)
CV    <- CI2CV(lower=lower, upper=upper, n=n)
cat(" CV =", round(CV*100, 1), "%\n",
"Power =", round(power.TOST(CV=CV, theta0=GMR, n=n)*100, 1), "%\n")


BTW, do you think that it makes sense to report the AUC with eight significant digits?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
137 visitors (0 registered, 137 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5