Basic maths [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-11-07 21:09 (3825 d 02:48 ago) – Posting: # 13844
Views: 17,391

Hi Monica,

❝ Sorry if I posted my question on the wrong place (first time posting on this forum).


No problem; welcome to the club!

❝ I used the formula presented on slides 25-26 on a clinical protocol as justification for sample size calculation and the mexican regulatory agency asked for a scientific justification …


Oh no! I derived it on my own ages ago. That’s 8th grade maths. Any 14 year old kid should be able to do it. I’m not aware of any reference.

❝ … or a bibliography where the robustness of the formula can be proved/demosntrated.


The formula is exact if the study is balanced (nTR = nRT = ½N). Sometimes you don’t know whether a study was balanced (only the total number of completers given). If N is odd, it was imbalanced for sure. If N is even, you have no clue. Have a look at my example (slide 29). The study was extremely imbalanced (16:8) and the true CV 24.74%. But you don’t know that (only N 24 given). For any given combination of subjects in sequences you would estimate a CV which is higher than the true one. In other words, if you plan a study based on the estimate the sample size will be higher than required. You loose money, but don’t risk to be underpowered.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
106 visitors (0 registered, 106 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5