Basic maths [Power / Sample Size]
Hi Monica,
No problem; welcome to the club!
Oh no! I derived it on my own ages ago. That’s 8th grade maths. Any 14 year old kid should be able to do it. I’m not aware of any reference.
The formula is exact if the study is balanced (nTR = nRT = ½N). Sometimes you don’t know whether a study was balanced (only the total number of completers given). If N is odd, it was imbalanced for sure. If N is even, you have no clue. Have a look at my example (slide 29). The study was extremely imbalanced (16:8) and the true CV 24.74%. But you don’t know that (only N 24 given). For any given combination of subjects in sequences you would estimate a CV which is higher than the true one. In other words, if you plan a study based on the estimate the sample size will be higher than required. You loose money, but don’t risk to be underpowered.
❝ Sorry if I posted my question on the wrong place (first time posting on this forum).
No problem; welcome to the club!
❝ I used the formula presented on slides 25-26 on a clinical protocol as justification for sample size calculation and the mexican regulatory agency asked for a scientific justification …
Oh no! I derived it on my own ages ago. That’s 8th grade maths. Any 14 year old kid should be able to do it. I’m not aware of any reference.
❝ … or a bibliography where the robustness of the formula can be proved/demosntrated.
The formula is exact if the study is balanced (nTR = nRT = ½N). Sometimes you don’t know whether a study was balanced (only the total number of completers given). If N is odd, it was imbalanced for sure. If N is even, you have no clue. Have a look at my example (slide 29). The study was extremely imbalanced (16:8) and the true CV 24.74%. But you don’t know that (only N 24 given). For any given combination of subjects in sequences you would estimate a CV which is higher than the true one. In other words, if you plan a study based on the estimate the sample size will be higher than required. You loose money, but don’t risk to be underpowered.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- minimum number of subject in bioequivalence study khaoula 2014-09-27 11:14
- minimum number of subject in bioequivalence study ElMaestro 2014-09-27 11:26
- minimum number of subject in bioequivalence study khaoula 2014-09-27 23:49
- “Overpowered” studies due to GLs Helmut 2014-09-28 01:13
- “Overpowered” studies due to GLs khaoula 2014-09-28 22:36
- “Overpowered” studies due to GLs Helmut 2014-09-29 03:51
- Scientific Validation for the Sample Size Formula mreyes 2014-11-07 19:47
- Basic mathsHelmut 2014-11-07 20:09
- Basic maths mreyes 2014-11-07 20:47
- Reference for CI ⇒ MSE Helmut 2014-12-14 01:51
- Reference for CI ⇒ MSE mreyes 2015-02-19 19:50
- Failed study: power <80%! Helmut 2015-02-20 19:09
- Failed study: power <80%! mreyes 2015-02-23 17:07
- Reported 99.98%, correct 1.4% Helmut 2015-02-23 17:38
- Reported 99.98%, correct 1.4% ElMaestro 2015-02-23 17:51
- GMR ∉ AR ⇒ power <5% Helmut 2015-02-24 01:33
- GMR ∉ AR ⇒ power <5% mreyes 2015-02-24 17:34
- GMR ∉ AR ⇒ power <5% Helmut 2015-02-24 01:33
- Reported 99.98%, correct 1.4% ElMaestro 2015-02-23 17:51
- Reported 99.98%, correct 1.4% Helmut 2015-02-23 17:38
- Failed study: power <80%! mreyes 2015-02-23 17:07
- Failed study: power <80%! Helmut 2015-02-20 19:09
- Reference for CI ⇒ MSE mreyes 2015-02-19 19:50
- Basic mathsHelmut 2014-11-07 20:09
- “Overpowered” studies due to GLs khaoula 2014-09-28 22:36
- “Overpowered” studies due to GLs Helmut 2014-09-28 01:13
- minimum number of subject in bioequivalence study khaoula 2014-09-27 23:49
- minimum number of subject in bioequivalence study ElMaestro 2014-09-27 11:26