Using the Variability of IR for MR formulation [Power / Sample Size]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2014-08-28 21:09 (4313 d 22:16 ago) – Posting: # 13441
Views: 6,027

Dear All,

I'm having some discussion with colleagues on the question of CVIR usage (from published assessment reports TestIR vs. ReferenceIR) for MR formulation bioequvalence study (TestMR vs. ReferenceMR single dose).
I'm quite doubt that CV from bioequivalence IR study is a good idea. As I remember bioequivalence assesses similarity of absorption (product specific) – not elimination (drug specific)
Therefore CVintra depends on API as well as formulation (and many other factors).
Am I right?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
164 visitors (0 registered, 164 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5